Meet Gary WickhamProfessor of Sociology |
Education
- BA (Hons)
- MA (Hons)
- PhD
Recent Articles in Refereed Journals (with indication of journal quality)
- 2010 Wickham, G. ‘Sociology, the Public Sphere, and Modern Government’ British Journal of Sociology, (A*)
- 2008 Wickham, G. ‘Competing Uses of History in Researching the Social: A Reply to Peter Baehr’ Current Sociology (B) 56:6, 953-958.
- 2008 Wickham, G. ‘High society: Are our social sciences as relevant to government as they might be?’ Australian Universities Review (unclassified) 50:2, 25-32.
- 2008 Wickham, G. ‘Protecting Law from Morality’s Stalking Horse: The “Socio” in Socio-Legal Studies’ Law, Text, Culture (A) 12, 104-127.
- 2008 Wickham, G. ‘The Social Must Be Limited: Some Problems With Foucault’s Approach to Modern Positive Power’ Journal of Sociology (A) 44:1, 29-44.
- 2008 Wickham, G. and G. Kendall ‘Critical Discourse Analysis, Description, Explanation, Causes: Foucault’s Inspiration Versus Weber’s Perspiration’. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung (unclassified) 33:1, 142-161 (selected from Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung).
- 2008 Wickham, G. and Kendall, G. ‘What Once Was Old Is New Again: Reviving an Early-Modern Form of Interdisciplinarity for Socio-Legal Studies’ Flinders Journal of Law Reform (B) 10:3, 485-500.
- 2008 Wickham, G. and H. Freemantle ‘Some Additional Knowledge Conditions for Sociology’ Current Sociology (B) 56:6, 925-942.
- 2007 Wickham, G. ‘Expanding the Classical in Classical Sociology’ Journal of Classical Sociology (B) 7:3, 243-265.
- 2007 Wickham, G. and G. Kendall ‘Critical Discourse Analysis, Description, Explanation, Causes: Foucault’s Inspiration Versus Weber’s Perspiration’ Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung (unclassified) 8:2 (electronic journal, no page numbers).
- 2006 Wickham, G. ‘Foucault, Law and Power: A Reassessment’ Journal of Law and Society (A*) 23:4, 596-614 (one of the five most accessed articles from this journal in 2007).
- 2006 Wickham, G. ‘The Law-Morality Relation Revisited: A Challenge to Established Traditions by the Australian Sceptical Approach’ Griffith Law Review (B) 15:1, 27-48.
Here's what you can do next...
- Learn more about...
- Ask a question
- Browse other courses
- Ready to apply? Find out how...
